![]() “That HBO has now joined the tabloid media’s ‘Michael Jackson cacophony’-ten years after his death-is truly sad,” continues the letter. The Michael Jackson Estate asserts that if HBO cared about ethics, it would not air the documentary. ![]() Weitzman writes, “Given all of this, which are facts readily available to anyone doing minimal due diligence, why would HBO produce a documentary based solely on the words of these two liars and director/producer Dan Reed? Why would HBO produce this documentary without even seeking comment and response from the Jackson Estate who spent years successfully litigating these false allegations with Robson and Safechuck? Is there any other artist who HBO would do this to? Is there any other artist who HBO would not even seek comment from when making such serious accusations?” The letter conveys the case that Michael Jackson’s two accusers have been “caught lying” in testimony and slams HBO’s decision to bolster their credibility. Weitzman writes that HBO “is being used as part of Robson’s and Safechuck’s legal strategy,” as the two are currently seeking appeals, and slams the network and filmmakers for “intentionally” choosing not to interview anyone that would detract from their story. The letter avoids explicit legal threats for airing the film, but does attack HBO’s decision to do so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |